Myles O’Grady: Thank you, Eamonn, and good morning to everyone joining us on the call today. Before we talk through the results in detail, our opening slide presents our positive outlook for the medium-term. Bank of Ireland continues to be highly capital generative. Supported by a growing Irish economy and our market position, I expect loan and deposit book growth and wealth AUM growth while retaining our proven cost discipline. Seizing this opportunity translates into a return on tangible equity of greater than 17% by 2027, and I'll come back to these building blocks shortly. Successfully executing our strategy is driving this performance. In terms of stronger relationships, we're growing customer numbers, while at the same time reaching an all-time high with our Net Promoter Score, an excellent benchmark for customer satisfaction. We're making our business simpler with more active digital users and materially lower customer complaints. And sustainable lending is up 32%, broadly achieving our EUR15 billion target one year early. 2024 was another year of strong strategy execution. We've delivered positive business momentum and financial performance. The highlights include growth in loans and deposits and a significant increase in assets under management, another very good year of profitability and efficiency and strong capital generation and returns. This supports EUR1.2 billion total distribution, up 6% year-on-year, the group's largest ever. Our business model is outperforming our peer group, reporting higher capital generation and total shareholder returns than the peer average. This is underlined by cumulative distributions for 2023 and 2024 of EUR2.4 billion. This is equivalent to more than a quarter of our market cap. The Irish economy is growing and continues to outperform the euro area. Private sector credit and deposits are strong, and the trajectory for housing completions underpinned by Ireland's demographic advantages will grow the mortgage market. All of this presents a tangible commercial opportunity. It is clear, of course, that the world is in a period of heightened uncertainty and evolving international trade policies add complexity. We monitor this closely. Ireland is on track to run a fiscal surplus for a fourth successive year. The national debt is also tracking down at 41% compared to 88% for the euro area. These factors put Ireland in a good place today and position it well for any future challenges that may arise. At Bank of Ireland, our focus is on growing our business with this growing economy. To that point, on Slide 10, we set out an excellent performance in Irish mortgages. Our mortgage book is up 7% with a 40% share of new mortgage lending. With the planned increase in housing completions, I expect our Irish mortgage book to continue growing, delivering stable and attractive returns into the future. And looking into that future, we continued to innovate. We have seen a positive reaction to the launch of our EcoSaver Mortgage product, which rewards customers as they improve the energy rating of their home. And our mortgage service improvements are building customer satisfaction with customer scores up considerably in the last year. On Slide 11, we detail a strong performance from our everyday banking businesses. Here, I am pleased to report growing customer balances and fee income growth of 4%, while also reaching an all-time high in customer satisfaction. As with mortgages, innovation and investments drive this performance. Looking ahead, we will benefit from ongoing deposit growth and we'll continue to enhance our digital offering at pace. That includes upgrading our mobile app and continuing to roll out a new customer lending platform for our small business and agri customers. Slide 12 sets out the significant opportunity we see for our Wealth and Insurance business in Ireland. Last year, total AUM increased 19% to EUR55 billion. Both Davy and New Ireland contributed to this result. Since I joined the Bank of Ireland Group in June 2022, Davy's AUM has grown by 55%. And New Ireland Insurance has increased its protection policy sales to our new mortgage customers. Wealth and Insurance fee income now represents almost 50% of total group business income offering valuable capital light diversified income. The future for Wealth and Insurance is very positive. Irish household wealth is increasing. There are commercial opportunities, which we will target, and I expect AUM to grow by 30% over the next three years, that's significantly ahead of economic growth. Turning now to our Corporate and Commercial division. Here, the loan book has evolved in line with our strategy. We have delivered solid and sustainable growth in Ireland and increased fee income. As previously communicated, our corporate GB and U.S. CRE books have contracted as we allocate capital to higher returning activities. We've also made excellent progress on asset quality, delivering a material improvement in the NPE ratio. This year, we expect to drive continued growth in our Irish corporate book in line with the domestic economy. And we will grow fee income and corporate deposits, while our disciplined capital allocation will ensure continuing attractive returns. The picture is similar on Slide 14, which covers our Retail UK division. In recent years, we successfully repositioned this business. This has transformed its performance. Our UK subsidiary is now delivering sustainable returns with an underlying ROTE of 15%. We delivered a 27% increase in retail UK underlying profit last year. We also completed the sale of our UK personal loan books at a modest profit. Our outlook is for a stable loan book of circa GBP17 billion with an ongoing focus on operational efficiency. We're investing over GBP100 million in our UK business over the next three years to improve products, services and customer experience. And as Mark will speak to, we recognize the provision of GBP172 million in relation to our motor finance book. This is the final year of our three year strategy, and we've had a good start to the year. Slide 15 shows, we are meeting or beating our medium-term targets. We've delivered another year of high double-digit ROTE, 16.8% for 2024, while maintaining operating efficiency. And this has been reflected in our distributions. Today, we're setting out a 5% increase in our full year DPS to EUR0.63 and a EUR590 million approved buyback. This is the fourth year in a row where we have returned capital to shareholders via share buybacks. Taking the dividend and the buyback together, a combined EUR1.2 billion, we are today confirming an 80% payout ratio. Mark will now bring you through our financial performance in more detail, and I'll return to talk about our expectations for the medium-term.

Thank you, Myles. Slide 18 recaps on our strong financial performance in 2024. Key highlights are robust loan and deposit growth, strong AUM growth and an excellent asset quality performance and a ROTE of 16.8%. This all underpins our confidence in the outlook for this year and beyond. Our key income statement lines are shown on Slide 19. Income and costs evolved in line with our guidance and market expectations. Non-core items are higher than our guidance, and I'll come back to this. Slide 20 details net interest income. Last year, our NII was 2% lower on a like-for-like basis. This reflects higher liquid asset income, growth in loan volumes and increased funding costs. For 2025, we expect NII of greater than EUR3.25 billion. This takes into account our assumption of lower average interest rates and the wind down of corporate GB. These factors are partly offset by the combined benefits of continued loan and deposit growth and structural hedge benefits. These same positive factors will be the key drivers of our NII trajectory into 2026 and 2027. Slide 21 sets out how our loan book grew in line with our strategy in 2024. The standout in this slide is strong growth in lending in Ireland, which Myles referenced. This has become more broad based with commercial lending increasingly contributing, alongside an ongoing strong performance in mortgages. We also saw a modest growth in our continuing U.K. portfolios. The reduction in international corporate books primarily reflects the strategic rundown in our corporate GB and U.S. CRE portfolios. This year, we expect to see further growth in net lending. This reflects continued strong growth in Ireland, partially offset by ongoing deleveraging in the corporate portfolios that we are exiting. Slide 22 covers the building blocks of the 19% AUM growth we delivered last year. Robust net inflows were augmented by market growth. By leveraging the scale and the breadth of our propositions and distribution, we are uniquely placed to capture the future growth opportunity presented by the Irish market. Another highlight is the growth in our customer deposits. This was delivered while retaining our commercial discipline on pricing in a competitive marketplace. A key feature of 2024 was flow-to-term, which now accounts for around the tenth of our everyday banking balances. This year, we expect deposit growth of around 2% and a decrease in flow-to-term versus '24. Our structural hedge strategy is an important factor in smoothing our NII trajectory through the interest rate cycle. Slide 24 shows our structural hedge, gross fixed leg income was higher than last year with the average yield up 24 basis points helping to improve income. In 2025, we see this income circa 10% higher than 2024, driven by a further increase in yield and modestly higher balances. We see the structural hedge income tailwind continuing to support our NII trajectory in 2026 and 2027. Total business income increased by 4% last year. Our Wealth and Insurance and Retail Ireland franchises delivered good momentum in fee income. This year, we expect to see growth of circa 5% in business income with Wealth and Insurance, again, the main driver. On Slide 26, we cover operating expenses, which were in line with guidance. This performance included the investment of an additional EUR30 million to drive future of efficiencies. For this year, we expect circa 3% growth in operating expenses. The moderation in the growth rate reflects, in part, the delivery of benefits from our investment programs. The combined impact of both investments made and future investments to come will deliver further efficiencies in 2026 and beyond. This supports our outlook for broadly stable operating expenses post 2025. Finally, levies and regulatory charges sent lower last year, and we expect them to be stable this year. Non-core charges in 2024 were EUR275 million, higher than originally envisaged. This is largely down to UK motor finance, where we've taken a provision of EUR172 million. There are a number of variables at play and potential scenarios here and we've adopted a probability weighted approach. Our expectation is for more clarity on this later in 2025. We've also taken EUR108 million charge in relation to the impairment of software intangibles. On this slide, we also detail a gain of EUR85 million in relation to the disposal of our UK personal loans portfolio. For 2025, we expect the non-core charge to be in the range of EUR100 million to EUR125 million, largely reflecting restructuring costs. These will support our operating cost outlook beyond 2025. Turning to asset quality, where we delivered a significant improvement last year. As shown on Slide 28, our NPE ratio improved by 90 basis points to 2.2%. This is in line with the European averages. This was primarily driven by strong organic cure and resolution activity, coupled with an NPE transaction in December. The 15 basis points impairment charge was better than our guidance. This is primarily due to better loan loss experience. The underlying loan loss experience charge was around 20 basis points. For 2025, the charge is expected to be in the low to mid-20 basis points, subject to no material change in economic conditions or outlook. Slide 30 showcases the strongly capital generative nature of our business model. Over the full year, we generated 310 basis points of organic capital. RWA investments of 65 basis points was in line with our prior guidance. Shareholder distributions including the final dividend and buyback announced today consumed 215 basis points. We finished the year with a fully loaded CET1 ratio of 14.6%, leaving us very strongly positioned. For 2025, expectation is for organic capital generation of 250 basis points to 270 basis points. In addition, we've increased our expectation of the benefit from Basel IV to circa 110 basis points from basis points previously. Slide 31 recaps all of our key guidance for this year. Together, this produces our expectation for a ROTE of circa 15% this year. Thank you. I'll now pass you back to Myles.

Myles O’Grady: Thanks, Mark. We're turning now to our medium-term outlook. Slide 23 captures the depth and breadth of our businesses, to which we are privileged to serve more than 4 million customers. Our banking, wealth and assurance model is unique in the Irish market, offering value to customers and returns to shareholders. Our blend of a physical on-the-ground footprint with engaging digital capabilities is a winning formula, helping serve customers better and faster. And our colleague engagement is now at an all-time high. Engage colleagues are vital to the progress we are making, and I would like to thank them for their contribution. Slide 34 sets out the four building blocks to our highly capital-generative business. Firstly, the markets we do business in, in particular, Ireland, with the economy on track to outperform euro area periods. Another block is our lending and deposit growth. We're delivering this today and see more to come. Thirdly, our differentiated business model, notably in Wealth and Insurance, where we have seen very strong AUM growth and expect more. And the final block is our focus on efficiency, where we have a proven track record. Now bringing all these together underpins my confidence for the years ahead and translates to a positive medium-term outlook. This includes return on tangible equity of above 17% in 2027, strong and sustainable capital generation of circa 750 basis points over the next 3 years with net capital generation equivalent to circa 45% of our market cap. A strong and attractive outcome for our shareholders. Thank you very much for your attention. Eamonn will now take us through the Q&A.

Thank you, Myles. [Operator Instructions] It looks like our first question will come from Sanjena Dadawala in UBS. Sanjena, you may unmute your audio, turn on your video and ask your question.

Thank you. Good morning. Thanks for taking the questions. First, could you talk about in more detail the outlook for net interest income and the path to the greater than 17% ROTE target by '27? Consensus, as it stands, is currently expecting broadly stable NII in '26, '27 after the '25 decline. And second, important for the ROTE and annual capital generation target, what keeps costs at around EUR2 billion in '26, '27 after the 3% growth in '25 and higher growth in the previous year? Thank you.

Myles O’Grady: Good morning, Sanjena. I'll take the question on costs, Mark can take the question in relation to the building blocks for net interest income. Sanjena, on costs, we've got a proven track record on cost control. Focus now is to future proof Bank of Ireland, ensure the sustainability of returns. Cost is an important component. I referenced our outlook on cost to be circa EUR2 billion each year out to '27. Given inflation, that requires productivity and cost reduction. So objective is a leaner or efficient organization, and we have a range of initiatives underway right across the entire organization that support that objective to be more efficient and leaner. Mark, on net interest income?

Yeah. Good morning, Sanjena. And you're right, NII performance is a key input into our ROTE outlook, so on ROTE building to greater than 17% by 2027. Our guidance for 2025 is for NII to be greater than EUR3.25 billion and we see it building from there. So NII higher in 2026 and followed by stronger growth in 2027. And to help you and put some numbers on that in 2026, we see NII a little above EUR3.3 billion and more meaningful growth in NII in 2027 to circa EUR3.5 billion. The key factors informing that outlook, obviously, rate assumptions, but the positive impact of balance sheet growth and also the structural hedge. And my sense is that maybe the structural hedge factor may be a little bit underappreciated by the market.

Thanks, Mark. Thanks, Sanjena.

Thank you.

Myles O’Grady: Thanks, Sanjeena.

Thanks, Sanjena. We'll now move on to our next question, Diarmaid Sheridan in Davy.

Thanks, Eamonn. Good morning, Myles. Good morning, Mark. Three questions, if I may. Maybe first of all, you talked about balance sheet growth there. Maybe you could give us a flavor of the areas that you're expecting to see growth coming through in the next couple of years, obviously, picking up beyond this year coming. Secondly, just around dividends and buybacks distributions more generally. Obviously, in the press release this morning -- or the RNS this morning, you talked about kind of material capital return over '25 to '27 cumulatively. Maybe you could talk to kind of what you think the strategy will be around returning that? And maybe finally, and somewhat interrelated to that and the ROTE, maybe just any comments you might have around capital efficiencies. Are you broadly happy with the level of risk-weighted assets once we get to Basel IV or do you feel that there's kind of ongoing initiatives that you would look to kind of help with the ROTE building blocks there? Thank you.

Myles O’Grady: Thanks, Diarmaid. Good morning. I might ask Mark to take the risk-weighted asset question and I'll take the first two. So in relation to balance sheet growth, again, I'd point to the performance for this year, where we saw the Irish loan book grow 6%, so very strong performance. And I've set out some of the building blocks to '27, which again include ongoing balance sheet growth, both from lending but also from deposits. So on the lending side, again, the two areas that I feel confident in relation growth. Firstly, in the mortgage book, that grew 7% last year. And we know that our demand for new homes in Ireland in the region of 50,000. Last year, we produced 30,000 new homes, this year targeting 42,000 across the system and that's going to be a source of growth, for sure. And secondly, a very strong indicator last year is the private sector credit now above 3% and I can translate that into business and Corporate Banking growth as well. That book grew 6% last year and I expect that to be a source of growth as well, particularly as there is a renewed confidence from our business customer base to invest for the future. And of course, the other part of our balance sheet on the deposit side, overall, I expect that to grow as well by about 3%, mindful of the deposits typically grow in line with the economy. And those targets also capture our best view on how the competitive environment is going to evolve in Ireland over the next number of years. In relation to how the distribution plays out, so, again, for last year, a EUR1.2 billion proposed distribution, that's up 6% compared to last year. Also equates to a payout ratio of 80%, up from 72%. So strong growth in that. That's the second year of distribution of more than EUR1 billion. And again, given the strong capital-generative nature of the model, that 750 basis points out over the next three years I expect the distributions to be a combination of a progressive dividend per share and the return of surplus -- of capital, which we expect to consider on an annual basis. Mindful of course, also last year we introduced for the first time in quite some time an interim cash dividend, that will be a feature of 2025 as well. And Mark, on the risk weighted assets?

Yeah. Good morning, Diarmaid. Yeah. So maybe you referenced obviously a key development to keep positive is Basel IV coming in this year. We've upgraded our guidance on the capital benefit from that to circa 110 basis points from 80 basis points previously. If I bring back to RWA then, I think if I look at consensus for '25 and '26, I think consensus is pretty much in the right place, maybe we'll be a tad higher than that given our loan growth expectations. But really, if I think about the dynamics from an RWA perspective, Basel IV being the one-time reduction in 2025 and then RWA growing broadly in line with loan growth from there.

Thank you.

Myles O’Grady: Thank you very much.

Okay. We'll now move on to our next question, which is from Ben Toms in RBC.

Good morning. Thanks very much taking my questions. The first one is just on a risk that's regularly cited by investors and that's U.S. tariff. Can you just talk a little bit how that -- about that risk and whether there's any potential for this to feed into the Irish growth story over the next couple of years. And then secondly, you talked about the structural hedge being underappreciated by the time we get to 2027. And you've helpfully given us the maturing yields and the structural hedge in 2025. Can you just help us with the maturing yields in '26 and '27 to help us quantify that tailwind. Thank you.

Myles O’Grady: Great. Thank you very much, Ben. Mark will take the structural hedge question and let me cover off the question in relation to economic risks. So again, the backdrop, earlier I spoke about an outlook for a ROTE to be above 17% by 2027, that's supported by a base case assumption that by 12% out over the next three years. A very strong factor supporting that, growth in employment, population growth, and of course, also a level of spending increase both from consumers and from investment in public sector spending as well. For all of that, there is downside risk from the risk of trade dislocation from trade tariffs. If I look at the export sector in Ireland, very strong performance last year. Pharma up 18% and technology-related exports up 19% or in that region. And therefore, I think the strength of the export sector in Ireland, that's been built up over 40 years. It's a very stable part of the Irish economy. I'm also mindful that in Ireland, we're not producing cars for export, we're producing medicine. I think that's an enduring factor. And of course, having presence in Ireland from a foreign direct investment perspective offers access to the single market in euro. They are all the positive factors, but it is reasonable to assume that there's a level of risk associated with how this fast-pacing economic situation may evolve. But I think we enter into that in a strong position. And maybe one final point, if we look at the fiscal position of Ireland, debt to GDP at 41%. That compares to a euro average of 88%. And certainly, that offers capacity should challenges emerge. Thanks a lot, Ben.

Hi, Ben. Yeah. Good morning. Aust on the structural hedge, so I say structural hedge is doing precisely what we wanted it to do. It's providing that support to NII as rates go lower. And the overall size of structural hedge, EUR64 billion, we see that growing modestly over the next couple of years in line with deposit growth. Specifically, on the maturing yield of 1.50% and we've got EUR9.5 billion or so maturing annually, so 1.50% in 2025. The uptick on that is somewhere to 2.30%, 2.40%. The yield -- or the maturing yield in 2026 and 2027, a little bit lower than that. That is all factored in. So about 1.25% actually, Ben. And that's all factored into our NII outlook into 2026 and 2027. So deposit growth, loan growth and the structural hedge all contributing to that trajectory over the next three years.

Thank you.

Myles O’Grady: Thanks, Ben.

The next question is from Grace Dargan in Barclays.

Hi. Good morning. Thanks very much for taking my questions. I guess, firstly, maybe just coming back on costs and just thinking about some of the moving parts and the programs you're undertaking to keep those costs flat, can you give us a little bit more detail? And I guess maybe linked to that, how should we be thinking about restructuring charges beyond '25? Are they mainly kind of software, technology driven changes in costs and we should be thinking about more write-downs? Is it going to be more headcount reductions, branch reductions? Any guidance, that would be helpful. And then just secondly, I guess, on the ROTE, it's great. It looks like a big uplift versus where consensus is. So where do you think consensus is wrong in kind of '26, '27? I guess you've touched on NII. Are there any other parts in particular? Thank you.

Myles O’Grady: Good morning, Grace. And let me take the question -- the broad question on costs and also the, I guess, the building blocks for ROTE and consensus. And Mark, you might come back on the restructuring component of the cost base. So again, Grace in setting out at that target to maintain costs in the region of EUR2 billion, that does require -- given inflation, it does require productivity, it does require cost reduction. Objective is a leaner, more efficient organization. So those initiatives, firstly, they relate to our overall complement of FTE and also to where we target third-party costs as well. So I do expect FTE levels to be lower out over the three years. I also expect us to consolidate our third-party providers to deliver a more efficient support model. Some specific examples that delivered those savings. As an example, we've digitized and reengineered our platform for commercial lending. That translates into faster applications, but also faster approval of loans. We have deployed our -- and are deploying more Gen AI use cases that supports data engineering, contact centers, more use of robotics, going after our -- what we call our KYC, so know your customer onboarding process, that's a complex process given all of the compliance backdrop. So that's an important area to lean out. We're also in-sourcing lower cost and more effective engineers to support technology change. And indeed, a review of span and layers to ensure we have the right shape of our organization out in the longer term. So all parts of the organization will contribute and, of course, all in the context of a growing business model as well, which points, I think, to your question on ROTE. So again, maybe to recap on the components. Firstly, it's supported by that stable, resilient and growing Irish economy and translating into balance sheet growth. We've seen very strong performance in that over the last two years, that will continue. I've offered an outlook in relation to that lending book growth, but also deposit book growth. That might be a factor for consensus to look at. Our net interest income, Mark has spoken about the positive impact, in particular, of the structural hedge as we go out over time. That's a factor. Growing our Wealth and Insurance business. We've seen a very good performance up 19% last year. Again, that's a valuable source of what I would describe as capital-light diversified income. That's going to be a feature. So that's a sense, Grace, of the moving parts that support both the cost, trajectory and the building blocks for ROTE, again, to be above 17% by 2027. And Mark, on the restructuring component?

Yes. So the restructuring piece is, Grace, so our guidance this year of EUR100 million to EUR125 million, that is primarily restructuring related but there are some other elements of that as well. We see that probably at a similar level in 2026 before tapering down, again, supporting that overall trajectory on operating expenses.

Thank you very much.

Thanks, Grace.

Thanks, Grace. We'll move on next to Chris Cant in Autonomous.

Good morning. Thanks for the call and taking the questions. If I could have two, please. First on your tangible book. So about EUR10.5 billion at the end of '24. With the kind of the RWA path you're thinking about, obviously, we could track tangible book in line with that, but I guess there's a couple of other things going on in terms of the DTA reabsorption and cash flow hedge pull to par over the next couple of years given the structural hedge dynamics. So how should we be thinking about the tangible book development from here? And I guess the question I'm trying to ask indirectly is what's the denominator for your 2027 greater than 17% that we should be thinking about? It's got this added complication because you exclude the pension surplus, it's quite hard for us to get to from the outside. The other question I wanted to ask was on cost of risk, please. So another strong year in terms of underlying performance. You're guiding confident beyond to 2025. Is the old through the cycle cost of risk guidance you used to give us in the sort of 30% to 40% range, is that now somewhat stale? And should we be thinking about this balance sheet delivering a structurally lower cost of risk than we used to have in our minds going forward over your planning period? Thank you.

Myles O’Grady: Good morning, Chris. Mark, would you like to take those two, please?

Yeah, I will. Good morning, Chris. So tangible book, so we use an adjusted tangible book, as you sort of highlighted in your question in calculating ROTE. That excludes surplus capital. So that was EUR8.7 billion, you can see that in the slides. There's a slide in that in our disclosures for 2024. It will reduce in 2025 for Basel IV by about EUR500 million. Referencing DTA and other factors and loan growth, we see it growing by a couple of hundred million from there through 2027. So hopefully, that helps you in terms of the denominator. In terms of cost of risk, yes, asset quality is a really -- we've had a really exceptional performance in 2024. The NPE ratio down to 2.2%. That's in line with the European averages and improvements right across the books. Our impairment loss expectation going out, Chris, is probably similar to the low to mid-20s that we're guiding for 2025. And I'd note that relative to the sort of previous levels you spoke about, we, for example, exited U.K. personal loans, which would typically be a higher impairment incurring business than others.

Thanks, Mark. Thank you, Chris.

Thank you.

It looks like our next question is from Sheel Shah, if you want to ask your question.

Great. Thanks for the presentation. Two questions from me, please. Firstly, on CET1. Now you printed 14.6% compared to the previous year at 14.3% and you're talking about distributions above 14%. So should we think about 14.6% being the level, which you're willing to solve to on an annual basis when it comes to the end of year distributions? And secondly, a question on the Wealth business. You're targeting 7% to 8% AUM growth going out to 2027. Are there associated costs in relation to this AUM growth? Should we be thinking about adviser costs? You mentioned a commercial opportunity. And then just to tag on the back of that, what is the level of business income growth that is associated with this AUM growth? Thank you.

Myles O’Grady: Well, Sheel, thank you for that and let me take those two. So landing on a CET1 of 14.6%, just to recap, it's after the EUR1.2 billion proposed distribution. And certainly, as you will have heard me say before, no desire to sit on excess capital. I think about cumulative distributions for '23 and '24 equivalent to 27% of our market cap. So I would regard 14.6% very much as a point-in-time decision. It captures a range of factors, including business requirements, business outlook and indeed the macro backdrop. So no change to our capital target to be above 14%. I did reference capital generation out to 2027 expecting that to grow by 750 basis points out over the three years. And I think that's the most important component really when we think about the sustainability of distributions out over the next three years. On the Wealth question, so we're very pleased with our Wealth performance overall. Very strong AUM growth, again, up 19% in the year. And maybe some of the components of that, if I think about Davy, had a particularly strong year. Wealth AUM assets up 25%, but corresponding fee income for that part of our Wealth business up 21%. And so therefore, if I combine that with the opportunity in the marketplace, strong levels of cash in the system, household wealth increasing as well, they're the reasons why we feel very comfortable regarding the growth in AUM. We expect it to grow faster than the economy. And again, we also expect Wealth fee income to grow faster than economic growth, hence, the guidance or outlook today. And in setting out our targets to maintaining the cost base in the region of EUR2 billion, I mean, that captures the cost base required to deliver that Wealth strategy out over the next three years.

[Operator Instructions] And it looks like our next question actually is coming through from Borja Ramirez from Citi.

Yes. Hello. Good morning. Thank you very much for your time on for taking my questions. I have two. Firstly, on the capital and the capital generation target for 2025 of between 250 and 270 bps, I would like to ask if that includes the effect from DTA consumption. And also the 14% target, when do you expect to reach that, if there's any details on the potential time line? And then my other question would be on the deposit beta. It seems based on the ECB data, it was quite low in Ireland, so quite positive trends there. So if you could kindly update on the deposit beta and also what assumptions you have included in the guidance? Thanks.

Myles O’Grady: Borja, good morning. Thank you very much for those questions. I'll ask Mark to take the DTA question and maybe the deposit beta as well. And then I'll come back on the capital position.

Perfect. Borja, good morning. The capital generation guidance that we've given for 2025, and indeed, over the next three years does incorporate the benefit of DTA. That is not recognized in our capital today, but does get released to capital. Our DTA assets, about EUR600 million on balance sheet, at the end of 2024 we see, given our outlook, we see that being broadly utilized by sometime in 2028. In terms of deposit betas, so we think about that probably more in terms of flow to term. And flow to term, I think, largely played out in line with our expectations in 2024. So about 10% of our deposit base in term and equivalent products just over EUR3 billion of flow in 2024. We do see the flow-to-term being lower in 2025 than in 2024 and that is incorporated into our NII guidance of greater than EUR3.25 billion for 2025 and obviously that builds into 2026 and 2027 that I referenced earlier.

Myles O’Grady: And Borja, in relation to the capital target to be above 14%, and in that context, I think about '25 distributions for this year will continue to comprise a progressive dividend per share. And as with last year, there will be a dividend at the half year with surplus capital considered annually. And again, the -- I know it's -- I referenced it earlier, it's important to say it, that capital generation of 750 basis points out over the next three years offers a stronger degree of confidence on our ability to ensure we maintain progressive dividends and the return of surplus capital back to shareholders. Again, no desire to hoard capital when we don't need it. Thank you very much.

Thank you.

We'll now move on to our next question from Seamus Murphy in Carraighill.

Hi, guys. Thanks very much. Super numbers. Can I just ask you a very simple question. Just in terms of you spoke about the hedge growing into 2026 and 2027. But if I just look at the numbers, I think you said there was a EUR3 billion flow to term in 2020 -- this year. And if we assume that it's something similar over the next couple of years, which would be a lower percentage flow to term, then how does the hedge actually grow because deposit growth is only running at 2% to 3% in Ireland. So that's the first question. The second question is coming back to this capital. I mean, again, we're 14.6% basically this year, but the additional Basel III gets us 14.9%. Give the trajectory of the profit outlook, I suppose, we, again, question like why hold back basically just in terms of being slightly more aggressive in terms of your repurchase policies? Thank you.

Myles O’Grady: Good morning, Seamus And again, so that position of 14.6% where we landed at for 2024, very much a point in time decision. And again, it does capture a range of factors that we consider. That's about the outlook for the business, which have a positive view on, and of course, also the macro backdrop as well. I would point to a EUR1.2 billion distribution for '24, the largest distribution ever made by Bank of Ireland, up 6% on last year. Payout ratio increasing from 72% to 80%. And again, that trajectory of capital generation of 750 basis points out over the next number of years offer strong confidence in our ability to ensure that we continue to have a progressive dividend, and indeed, return surplus capital. Mark, on the hedge question?

On the hedge. So Seamus, maybe a couple of parts there. So one is deposit growth we speak about sort of 2%. That's our expectation this year in our Irish franchise, but growing from there, particularly as rates go low into later this year and next year. And then secondly, that flow to term, as we said, EUR3 billion last year, but lower this year and I think lower as the rate cycle goes lower. So those are the dynamics. I mean, we're talking probably EUR1 billion a year or so, Seamus, like it's of that order. But indeed, there is modest growth in the structural hedge over the next couple of years.

Thanks, Mark.

Thank you, Seamus.

Okay. We'll now move on to our next question from Rob Noble.

Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. They've kind of been touched on already, right? But your ROTE guide is based on a 14.0% core Tier 1 base. You're in a great capital position, great capital outlook, Basel helps, etc., capital generation north of 300 basis points, never had a higher ROTE right? So -- and you haven't paid down 14.0%. So is the ROTE -- is the 14.0% base actually right? Are you actually going to pay down or should I run 14.5% through my model into perpetuity? And then on the costs, just a bit more on the cost, right? I don't know how if I build this up, I've got 5% growth in employee numbers. I think you've negotiated 3% to 4% wage growth. So -- and all of the employee growth is in IT employees because you're investing in tech, right, so it's expensive. I don't understand how the cost base stays flat without substantial reductions in full-time employees. Is that what we should expect?

Myles O’Grady: Yeah. Thanks for those questions, Rob. On the ROTE, the capital target, I mean, we assume for the ROTE calculation that it's off a 14% ROTE. So that's, I think, good for model purposes. And again, given the strong levels of capital generation, we expect to return capital and not to sit on excess capital. The actual decision is a point-in-time. It captures a range of factors. On the cost piece, again, there are two components of that cost reduction, that desire to be a more efficient and lean organization. Yes, for sure. On the head count side, FTEs, I expect overall FTEs to be lower out over the next number of years. As an example of our intent in that regard, FTE remained flat in the second half of last year and so that's the progress we're making over the course of '24. That will continue out over the next three years. Of course, a large part of Bank of Ireland's cost base is also third-party support and that's an area of focus as well, where we will consolidate the number of parts and secure efficiencies from that. And to your point about the technology point, which is well made, but actually one of the things that we're doing that's working very well is that we are outsourcing less of our change to third-parties and bringing in cheaper, more cost-efficient staff, particularly in relation to engineers, which are a critical part of delivering technology change. There's a range of factors across all of our divisions, across all of our geographical locations within all of our functions, they will all contribute to our overall ambition to ensure we keep our cost base in the region of EUR2 billion. Thanks, Rob.

Thank you.

We'll now move on to Denis in Goodbody.

Good morning, Myles and Mark, and thank you for taking my questions. Just two, please, if I may. So I'm just wondering if you can give us a little bit more color in how you arrived at your motor finance provision, please. So does it include an element of redress plus costs associated with a redress scheme? And then I'm also wondering within the non-core guidance for this year of EUR100 million to EUR125 million, is there a buffer within that for any potential further uplift to the provision? And then secondly, just again on, I guess, deposits and term migration, in particular, your flow to term in Q3, I believe, was a little bit higher than peers and expectations. So just wondering what the latest performance is there in quarter four and year-to-date? Thank you.

Myles O’Grady: Thanks, Denis. Mark, would you like to take those?

I will, indeed. Maybe, Denis, I'll take them in reverse order. So just on the flow to term, about EUR600 million in Q4 and it's often difficult to predict precisely the flow in any particular quarter. But I think the year played out broadly as anticipated in about 10% of our deposit base in term and similar on, I'd say, experience so far this year in line with our expectations. On motor finance, we've taken a EUR172 million or GBP143 million in relation to that. Maybe it's helpful to just walk through our approach in that regard, and our approach is designed to capture a number of variables. So those in include, for example, the outcome of the appeal to the Supreme Court, the likelihood of an FCA remediation scheme, the scope and time frame of any such scheme, the approach to compensatory interest, you mentioned administration costs, etc. So all those variables are things that we have considered, and the provision represents our best view and our best estimate of the group's exposure based on all of the information that we've got available at the present time. And specifically, that is our best view. So our guidance in terms of noncore for 2025, of course, doesn't include anything in that regard because we've taken our best view at the end of 2024.

Thanks, Mark.

Thank you, Rob. Denis, apologies, sorry.

Thank you.

We'll now move on to Andrew Stimpson. Andrew, you could ask your question.

Good morning, guys. Two for me, please. Firstly, on net interest income. The sensitivity guidance you gave is always for a parallel shift, which is fair enough because that's the data that we get from everyone. But it's obviously more likely that we see the short end come down a little lower and then we have hopefully a gently upward sloping yield curve by the half year stage. So I'm just thinking that's likely to be much less bad scenario for you than a parallel shift would be. Is there anything you'd critique on that statement? Maybe the shape of the yield curve ends up being a reason why the net interest income outlook ends up being a bit better on outer years. And then, secondly, on loan growth, you've made some very positive sounds there, but you've got a target of more than 3% to 2025. That will still be a material slowdown from what you achieved in '24. But obviously, with lower rates in '25, wouldn't that lead to better volumes than what you saw in '24, please?

Myles O’Grady: Andrew, thanks for that. I'll ask Mark to take the NII question. And in relation to loan growth, Andrew, for sure, last year very strong in the Irish franchise with the mortgage book growing by 7% and our commercial and corporate Irish book growing by 6%. The assumptions that we set out for '25 and indeed beyond, I mean, they factor in a range of considerations. Firstly, we see the totality of the market being bigger. So for example, the mortgage market will increase driven by the increased supply of new homes, and we're very well positioned to grow our book in that regard. And also general sentiment from business banking supporting the commercial and corporate book also growing in Ireland. I'm also mindful, of course, that competition is going to increase. And therefore, in setting out our targets that I have a lot of confidence behind, we want to make sure that they're realistic and achievable. They also factor in a renewed increase of competition in the marketplace, which, of course, we will compete for. And we'll always, really importantly, maintaining pricing discipline has been a feature of Bank of Ireland and will continue to be so into the future. But there are some of the considerations as we think about that outlook for '25 and beyond. Mark, on...

Yeah. On the NII sensitivity, Andrew, I maybe think about the question really in the context of our NII resilience and indeed ability to grow as rates come down and stabilize. And I think that's maybe the key message from this morning. The rate impact really is for us largely in 2025. There's a little bit in 2026. But the key positive factors in our NII trajectory, so the structural hedge, which we spent a bit of time on the call this morning on; deposit growth and loan growth driving NII forwards, and that gives us the confidence around the trajectory into 2026 and 2027.

Myles O’Grady: Great. Thank you very much, Andrew.

[Operator Instructions] So we'll now on to our next question, which is from Aman in Barclays.

Yeah. Good morning, guys. I just want to say thanks for letting me off the question and thanks for your guidance beyond '25, actually really appreciate that. I know there's lots of moving parts, but it's very helpful. I just wanted to talk about rate sensitivity. I think your rate sensitivity has come down by about 10% versus the last time I've seen that disclosure. So I just wanted to check what the moving parts were there. Is that just the shift to term deposits that's kind of driving that? And I guess more broadly, when you're thinking about your rate sensitivity from here to cuts, is there anything more that you can be doing? Can you expand your hedge notional as a percentage of your balance sheet because your structural pass-throughs are clearly coming in much, much, much better than what's being reflected in the hedging of your balance sheet. So I just wondered if there's more work to be done from a management point of view about protecting yourself the rate cuts from here, please? Thank you.

Myles O’Grady: Good morning, Aman, and thank you for the feedback. I'll ask Mark to take the rate sensitivity and those components of it. I do think, as a broad answer to your second question, which is that, firstly, interest income is very much supported by our outlook and balance sheet growth, both for lending and for deposits. And on the rate aspect of it, when we experienced a steep increase in rates, we're very careful to ensure that we protected value in the franchise, protected value in the back book particularly as well. And we've described that as being a balanced approach to apply in a rate environment on the increase. And we will be as disciplined as rates come down. I think we've seen some evidence of that in terms of where the ECB have moved and how we've considered that from a deposit and from a lending impact on the decisions we've made. So we will be very focused in the broad sense on ensuring, of course, we'll offer value to customers, but that pricing discipline will continue to be key. Mark, on the...

Aman, you've got the answer. You're correct, it's the shift in flow to term. That's what's driving the reduction in the downward leg.

Myles O’Grady: Thanks, Aman.

Thank you.

Okay, Aman. Thank you. It looks like actually, Aman, you were the last question. So this concludes today's conference call. And thanks, everyone, for your participation this morning. We look forward to meeting as many of you as possible over the coming weeks. And if you have any questions on these results or any other aspects of the presentation, please feel free to reach out to anybody on the Investor Relations team.